Our Talcum Powder Attorneys will review your case for FREE.
You could be entitled to compensation for injury from Talcum Powder!
Our attorneys are currently reviewing potential harms related to Talcum Powder.
Studies show women who used talc powder daily for more than four years are one-third more likely to develop certain forms of cancer, including the following:
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) potential talcum powder lawsuit cases and settlement claims are currently being investigated by our team of attorneys.
J&J talcum powder includes Johnson’s Baby Powder & J&J Shower to Shower powder.
Despite maintaining all along that the company’s talcum powder products were safe to use, Johnson & Johnson issued a recall of the company’s baby powder after the Food & Drug Administration detected a type of asbestos in a product sample in October 2019. Asbestos, a naturally occurring mineral, is a known carcinogen.
Johnson & Johnson Knew of the Dangers
Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is a multinational corporation that has been selling talcum powder products for over 100 years. The company's talcum powder products, including its iconic Baby Powder, have been marketed for use on babies, children, and adults to prevent skin irritation and absorb moisture.
However, J&J's talcum powder products have also been the subject of numerous lawsuits and controversies over the years. Here is a brief history of J&J's talcum powder-related issues:
· In the 1970s, J&J executives received reports from independent researchers about the potential link between talcum powder use in the genital area and ovarian cancer. However, the company did not issue any warnings to consumers or conduct any internal studies on the issue.
· In 1999, a jury awarded $10 million in damages to a woman who claimed that her use of J&J's talcum powder products caused her ovarian cancer. This was the first talcum powder lawsuit against J&J.
· In 2006, the International Agency for Research on Cancer classified talc as possibly carcinogenic to humans when used in the genital area.
· In 2013, a jury awarded $72 million in damages to the family of a woman who died from ovarian cancer after using J&J's talcum powder products for decades.
· In 2018, a Reuters investigation revealed that J&J knew for decades about the potential link between talcum powder use and cancer but failed to disclose this information to consumers or regulators.
· Currently, J&J faces over 34,000 lawsuits related to its talcum powder products. In some cases, juries have awarded multi-million-dollar verdicts to plaintiffs who claim that J&J's talcum powder products caused their cancer.
J&J has consistently denied any wrongdoing and continues to defend the safety of its talcum powder products. However, the company has also faced criticism for its handling of the issue and for failing to warn consumers about the potential risks associated with its talcum powder products.
What is the Problem?
Studies have shown that talcum powder products can contain asbestos or other harmful substances that can cause health problems when inhaled or applied to the skin. Inhalation of talcum powder can lead to mesothelioma, a rare but aggressive form of cancer that affects the lining of the lungs and other organs. Women who have used talcum powder products on their genital area may be at an increased risk for developing ovarian cancer. The American Cancer Society states that it is unclear how talcum powder may cause cancer, but it is thought that talc particles may travel through the vagina, uterus, and fallopian tubes to the ovaries, where they can cause inflammation and lead to the development of cancer cells.
Individuals who have been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after using talcum powder products may be eligible to file a lawsuit and recover compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, and pain and suffering. In some cases, families of individuals who have died as a result of talcum powder use may also be able to file a wrongful death lawsuit. It is important to note that each case is unique, and the compensation awarded will depend on the specific circumstances of the case.
Talcum powder lawsuits are an important way for individuals to seek justice and hold talcum powder companies accountable for the harm caused by their products. If you or a loved one has been diagnosed with ovarian cancer or mesothelioma after using talcum powder products, it is important to speak with an experienced attorney who can help you navigate the legal process and fight for your rights. By taking action, you can help raise awareness about the potential health risks associated with talcum powder use and ensure that companies are held responsible for their actions.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been monitoring the safety of talcum powder products for many years. In the 1970s, concerns were raised about the potential link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer, and the FDA began to investigate the issue.
In 1982, the FDA issued a report stating that there was not enough evidence to support the link between talcum powder and ovarian cancer. However, the report also stated that the available evidence was limited and that more research was needed.
Since then, the FDA has continued to monitor the safety of talcum powder products and has taken various actions to address concerns about their safety. In 2009, the FDA tested a variety of talcum powder products and found no asbestos contamination in any of the samples tested.
In 2018, the FDA held a public meeting to discuss the safety of talcum powder products and to gather input from stakeholders. The meeting focused on the potential risk of asbestos contamination in talcum powder products and how to improve testing and regulation of these products.
In recent years, the FDA has also taken action against specific talcum powder products that have been found to be contaminated with asbestos.
In March 2020, the FDA requested that Johnson & Johnson recall certain lots of their talcum powder products due to the presence of asbestos.
Overall, while the FDA has not banned talcum powder products, it continues to monitor their safety and take action when necessary to protect consumers. The agency recommends that consumers use talcum powder products as directed and avoid inhaling talcum powder.
Additionally, the FDA encourages manufacturers to test their talcum powder products for asbestos contamination and to provide clear warnings about the potential risks associated with their use.
Other articles regarding the risks of talc products
U.S Food & Drug Administration (FDA)
J&J knew for decades that asbestos lurked in its Baby Powder (reuters.com)
Aaronson & Rash, PLLC was founded in 2005. We handle cases nationwide from our principal office in Houston, Texas.
At Aaronson and Rash, PLLC, our attorneys are here to help you. We have over 40 years of combined experience in personal injury, environmental disasters, defective products, pharmaceutical litigation, and toxic exposure cases. Our legal team is ready to work with you and your family as we fight for the maximum compensation you deserve.
Bilingual staff is available for Spanish clients. At Aaronson & Rash, we believe that everyone deserves an experienced attorney, no matter their financial circumstances. That’s why we only accept cases on a contingency fee basis. Rather than an hourly legal fee, a contingency fee arrangement means that the attorney will not receive any payment until the completion of the lawsuit and only if the suit is successful.
We offer 100% free and confidential case evaluations. If you would like more information, click on the CONTACT button or call our offices at 844 THE LAW 4 (844-843-5294) for a FREE CASE EVALUATION from our experienced attorneys.
Important: There are strict time deadlines for filing your claim, ACT NOW
The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. These listings are not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of any other claims or lawsuits.
Aaronson and Rash, PLLC, 6200 Savoy, STE 950, Houston, TX 77036 Privacy policy Copyright © 2018 Aaronson and Rash PLLC - All Rights Reserved.
Aaronson and Rash PLLC Principal Office is in Houston, TX. While this firm maintains joint responsibility, most cases of this type are referred to other attorneys for principal responsibility. Aaronson and Rash are the attorneys responsible for the content of this advertisement. The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. No representation is made that the quality of the legal services to be performed is greater than the quality of legal services performed by other lawyers. This advertisement is not intended for residents of AL, AR, AZ, HI, IN, IA, MS, RI, SC, SD, TN, FL, NY, and KY. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contingent attorneys’ fee refers only to those fees charged by attorneys for their legal services. Such fees are not permitted in all types of cases. Court costs and other additional expenses of legal action usually must be paid by the client. The percentage fee will be computed before or after expenses are deducted from the recovery in accordance with state laws. Clients are responsible for their own unpaid medical bills. Client may have to pay opposing party’s attorney fees and costs in the event of a loss. Anyone considering a lawyer should independently investigate the lawyer’s credentials and ability, and not rely upon advertisement or self-proclaimed expertise.
By checking Submit I understand that this is an attorney advertisement and that I consent to being contacted by the law firm by email, SMS and voice telephone. By clicking Submit, you agree to send your info to Aaronson & Rash PLLC who agrees to use it according to their privacy policy.
*The listing of a company (i.e., J&J or Johnson & Johnson) or product (i.e., baby powder or talc) is not meant to state or imply that the company acted illegally or improperly or that the product is unsafe or defective; rather only that an investigation may be, is or was being conducted to determine whether legal rights have been violated.
**The use of any trademarks, tradenames or service marks is solely for product identification and/or informational purposes.